isidewith.comAmerica’s most popular voting guide for elections, political issues, candidates, and poll data

’) My beliefs My parties My ballot My support map My settings Logout United States Speaking English Try the political quiz Quiz Issues Elections Parties Ideologies Discuss Menu Share 2024 Presidential Quiz See which Presidential candidates match your personal beliefs Take the quiz! The worlds #1 voting guide for 79,403,636 politically engaged citizens Top Issues Here is the current rank of the most important political issues for American voters. #1 Abortion #2 LGBT Adoption Rights #3 Gay Marriage #4 Israel #5 Gender Identity #6 Deporting Criminal Immigrants #7 Transgender Athletes #8 Drug Price Regulation #9 Gender Transition #10 Police Body Cameras #11 Equal Pay As seen in Trending News Here are the stories making headlines in political news today. Active 9mins ago @ISIDEWITH submitted… 9mins 9m Arizona’s 1864 Abortion Ban Faces Delay: Supreme Court Grants Stay In a significant development for reproductive rights in Arizona, the state’s Supreme Court has granted a stay, delaying the enforcement of a Civil War-era abortion ban until at least mid-August. This 1864 law, which nearly prohibits abortions outright, has been the subject of intense legal scrutiny and debate in recent months. The decision to grant a delay comes as a relief to advocates for women’s health and legal rights, providing a temporary reprieve from a law that many view as archaic and out of step with modern medical and ethical standards.The Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling means that the state’s near-total abortion ban cannot be enforced until after August 12, with the Attorney General’s Office indicating that the earliest possible enforcement could be in September. This delay allows for further legal challenges and discussions about the law’s implications on women’s health and autonomy. The stay was granted following a request from state Attorney General Kris Mayes, highlighting the legal complexities surrounding abortion legislation in Arizona.The 1864 law’s potential reinstatement has sparked widespread concern among reproductive rights advocates, who argue that such a move would drastically limit access to safe and legal abortion services in the state. However, the recent legislative action by Arizona’s governor to repeal the Civil War-era law, coupled with the Supreme Court’s stay, suggests a shifting legal landscape. The new statute legalizing abortion up to 15 weeks of pregnancy will not take effect for several months, creating a window during which the old law could theoretically be enforced.This legal tug-of-war underscores the ongoing national debate over abortion rights, with states taking varied approaches to legislating and regulating access to abortion services. Arizona’s situation is particularly emblematic of the challenges faced by states with conflicting laws on the books, as it navigates the interplay between historical statutes and contemporary legal standards.As the Arizona Supreme Court grants more time for legal maneuvering, the future of abortion access in the state remains uncertain. The delay provides a crucial opportunity for further legal challenges and advocacy, with the potential for the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. This ongoing legal battle in Arizona is a microcosm of the broader national struggle over reproductive rights, highlighting the complexities and contentious nature of abortion legislation in the United States. ▲ 5 7 replies Active 2hrs ago @ISIDEWITH submitted… 2hrs 2H Jen Psaki to Correct Misleading Account of Biden’s Actions in Upcoming Book In a recent turn of events, former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki has announced her decision to amend a controversial passage in her forthcoming book, ’Say More,’ after facing backlash for inaccurately portraying President Joe Biden’s actions during a solemn ceremony. The passage in question falsely claimed that President Biden did not check his watch during the dignified transfer ceremony of American troops killed in the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. This incident had sparked widespread criticism, with many viewing the gesture as disrespectful to the fallen soldiers and their families.The decision to revise the book came after multiple sources, including Axios, highlighted the inaccuracy, prompting Psaki to acknowledge the mistake. As a respected former spokesperson for the Biden administration and current MSNBC host, Psaki’s initial account had the potential to mislead readers about a highly sensitive moment, underscoring the importance of accuracy in memoirs and political narratives.Psaki’s readiness to correct the record reflects a commitment to truth, even when it involves admitting errors. This episode underscores the challenges faced by public figures in recounting events, especially those that are politically charged or emotionally laden. It also highlights the scrutiny under which political memoirs and autobiographies are placed, as readers and critics seek an authentic account of historical events.The controversy surrounding the watch-checking incident is a reminder of the intense scrutiny public officials face, and how actions, even seemingly minor ones, can be interpreted in various ways depending on the context. For President Biden, who has often emphasized his support for the military and its families, the incident and its aftermath represent a moment of misunderstanding that has been magnified in the public eye.As Psaki makes the necessary corrections to her book, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for authors of political memoirs. The balance between personal recollection and factual accuracy is delicate, and the integrity of the narrative is paramount. This episode not only highlights the importance of accountability in public discourse but also the ongoing dialogue between public figures and the citizens they serve, a dialogue that is essential for a healthy democracy. ▲ 5 5 replies Active 1hr ago @TheRightRonnie from Texas submitted… 2hrs 2H Biden orders Chinese cryptominer to sell land near US military base The White House has ordered a Chinese group that runs a crypto-mining operation in Wyoming to sell the land where it keeps its servers because the facility is next to a base that houses US nuclear ballistic missiles. President Joe Biden ordered MineOne Partners and its partners to sell the land next to Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming within 120 days. He said the British Virgin Islands group was majority owned by Chinese nationals and had not informed the US government about the sensitive transaction. The US military deploys Minuteman III nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles at Warren AFB, in south-east Wyoming. In the divestiture order issued on Monday, Biden said MineOne used specialised equipment for cryptocurrency mining that included foreign-sourced technology which posed a national security risk. The proximity of the foreign-owned real estate to a strategic missile base and key element of America’s nuclear triad, and the presence of specialised and foreign-sourced equipment potentially capable of facilitating surveillance and espionage activities, presents a national security risk to the US,” Biden said in the order. ▲ 6 5 replies 1 agree Active 1hr ago @ISIDEWITH submitted… 2hrs 2H UNC Board Redirects Millions from DEI to Public Safety, Sparking Debate In a move that has ignited discussions across academic and political spheres, the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill Board of Trustees voted to significantly cut funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, reallocating these funds to enhance public safety and campus police services. This decision, made amidst broader national debates over the role and funding of DEI initiatives in educational institutions, marks a pivotal shift in the university’s budgetary priorities for the upcoming year.The board’s decision redirects approximately $2.3 million previously earmarked for DEI efforts to public safety measures, a move that supporters argue is...